[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1271358478.16881.2939.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 21:07:58 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code:
avahi-daemon: caller is netif_rx
Le jeudi 15 avril 2010 à 15:16 +0200, Eric Dumazet a écrit :
> Le lundi 12 avril 2010 à 21:40 +0200, Eric Dumazet a écrit :
> > Good spot, RPS changed a bit netif_rx() requirements.
> >
> > I would change ip_dev_loopback_xmit() to call netif_rx_ni() instead...
> >
> > David, Tom ?
> >
> > diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_output.c b/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
> > index c65f18e..d1bcc9f 100644
> > --- a/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
> > +++ b/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
> > @@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ static int ip_dev_loopback_xmit(struct sk_buff *newskb)
> > newskb->pkt_type = PACKET_LOOPBACK;
> > newskb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
> > WARN_ON(!skb_dst(newskb));
> > - netif_rx(newskb);
> > + netif_rx_ni(newskb);
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
>
> After some confusion, it seems this was the right fix after all :)
>
> [PATCH] ip: Fix ip_dev_loopback_xmit()
>
> Eric Paris got following trace with a linux-next kernel
>
> [ 14.203970] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000]
> code: avahi-daemon/2093
> [ 14.204025] caller is netif_rx+0xfa/0x110
> [ 14.204035] Call Trace:
> [ 14.204064] [<ffffffff81278fe5>] debug_smp_processor_id+0x105/0x110
> [ 14.204070] [<ffffffff8142163a>] netif_rx+0xfa/0x110
> [ 14.204090] [<ffffffff8145b631>] ip_dev_loopback_xmit+0x71/0xa0
> [ 14.204095] [<ffffffff8145b892>] ip_mc_output+0x192/0x2c0
> [ 14.204099] [<ffffffff8145d610>] ip_local_out+0x20/0x30
> [ 14.204105] [<ffffffff8145d8ad>] ip_push_pending_frames+0x28d/0x3d0
> [ 14.204119] [<ffffffff8147f1cc>] udp_push_pending_frames+0x14c/0x400
> [ 14.204125] [<ffffffff814803fc>] udp_sendmsg+0x39c/0x790
> [ 14.204137] [<ffffffff814891d5>] inet_sendmsg+0x45/0x80
> [ 14.204149] [<ffffffff8140af91>] sock_sendmsg+0xf1/0x110
> [ 14.204189] [<ffffffff8140dc6c>] sys_sendmsg+0x20c/0x380
> [ 14.204233] [<ffffffff8100ad82>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
>
> While current linux-2.6 kernel doesnt emit this warning, bug is latent
> and might cause unexpected failures.
>
> ip_dev_loopback_xmit() runs in process context, preemption enabled, so
> must call netif_rx_ni() instead of netif_rx(), to make sure that we
> process pending software interrupt.
>
> Reported-by: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_output.c b/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
> index c65f18e..d1bcc9f 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
> @@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ static int ip_dev_loopback_xmit(struct sk_buff *newskb)
> newskb->pkt_type = PACKET_LOOPBACK;
> newskb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
> WARN_ON(!skb_dst(newskb));
> - netif_rx(newskb);
> + netif_rx_ni(newskb);
> return 0;
> }
>
Oops silly me, I forgot ipv6
updated patch in a couple of minutes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists