[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BC77636.5060506@hp.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 13:25:26 -0700
From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
To: hadi@...erus.ca
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
therbert@...gle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, robert@...julf.net,
xiaosuo@...il.com, andi@...stfloor.org
Subject: Re: rps perfomance WAS(Re: rps: question
jamal wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-04-15 at 09:41 -0700, Rick Jones wrote:
>
>
>>IPS (~= RPS) was running on shared FSB HP9000's. Now, that was also a BSD
>>networking stack with netisrq's and the like. TOPS (~= RFS) was also run on
>>shared FSB HP9000s, as well as CC-NUMA HP9000s and Integrity systems. TOPS was
>>implemented in a Streams-based stack tracing its history to a common ancestor
>>with Solaris (Mentat).
>
>
> Sounds interesting.
> Wikipedia information overload. Any arch description of the HP9000?
I should have been more specific - HP 9000 Model 800's :) PA-RISC based business
computers running HP-UX. In the case of IPS, HP-UX 10.20 ca 1995 or so.
> Did your scheme use IPIs to message the other CPUs?
Netisrs were kernel processes one per CPU (back then a core, a processor and a
CPU were one and the same :), and while we didn't call them IPI's, yes, it was a
"soft interrupt" directed at the given processor to launch the netisr if it
wasn't already running.
TOPS was similar, but was with Streams and that did/does have some kernel
processes not everything would happen as a kernel process.
rick jones
HP 3000 Model 900's - by and large the same PA-RISC hardware but running MPE/XL
(later called MPE/iX)
HP 9000 Model 700's - PA-RISC based workstations
HP 9000 Model 300's - Moto 68K-based workstations (replaced by the 700s)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists