netdev - Re: Network multiqueue question

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <j2gb65cae941004152100je5a3c3c9lba9e96ecb95bf04c@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 15 Apr 2010 21:00:48 -0700
From:	"George B." <georgeb@...il.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Network multiqueue question

On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:

> Since this bothers me a bit, I will probably work on this in a near
> future. (adding real multiqueue capability and RCU to bonding fast
> paths)
>
> Ref: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/152987

That would be great and you would have my sincere thanks..  And if
anyone is interested, what we do is take a pair of "top of rack"
switches and cluster them together so they appear as one switch.
Configure a LAG consisting of a port on each physical switch to a pair
of bonded interfaces on the server and use mode 2 bonding.  In normal
operation, both interfaces are active.  Should one switch experience a
power or interface failure, the server sees one of the interfaces fail
but just keeps working on the remaining interface.  There is no
"failover" event going on.

Thanks,

George
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html