[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1271441758.16881.4207.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 20:15:58 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] rfs: Receive Flow Steering
Le vendredi 16 avril 2010 à 08:35 -0700, Tom Herbert a écrit :
> Eric, thanks for testing that. Admittedly, we have looked at enabling
> RFS/RPS over loopback. I'll look at that today also.
>
>
Hi Tom
I am sorry, but I could not work on this today. I hope I can find some
time a bit later.
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 11:56 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> > Le jeudi 15 avril 2010 à 23:33 -0700, David Miller a écrit :
> >> From: Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
> >> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 22:47:08 -0700 (PDT)
> >>
> >> > Version 5 of RFS:
> >> > - Moved rps_sock_flow_sysctl into net/core/sysctl_net_core.c as a
> >> > static function.
> >> > - Apply limits to rps_sock_flow_entires systcl and rps_flow_count
> >> > sysfs variable.
> >>
> >> I've read this over a few times and I think it's ready to go into
> >> net-next-2.6, we can tweak things as-needed from here on out.
> >>
> >> Eric, what do you think?
> >
> > I read the patch and found no error.
> >
> > I booted a test machine and performed some tests
> >
> > I am a bit worried of a tbench regression I am looking at right now.
> >
> > if RFS disabled , tbench 16 -> 4408.63 MB/sec
> >
> >
> > # grep . /sys/class/net/lo/queues/rx-0/*
> > /sys/class/net/lo/queues/rx-0/rps_cpus:00000000
> > /sys/class/net/lo/queues/rx-0/rps_flow_cnt:8192
> > # cat /proc/sys/net/core/rps_sock_flow_entries
> > 8192
> >
> >
> > echo ffff >/sys/class/net/lo/queues/rx-0/rps_cpus
> >
> > tbench 16 -> 2336.32 MB/sec
> >
> >
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > PerfTop: 14561 irqs/sec kernel:86.3% [1000Hz cycles], (all, 16 CPUs)
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > samples pcnt function DSO
> > _______ _____ ______________________________ __________________________________________________________
> >
> > 2664.00 5.1% copy_user_generic_string /lib/modules/2.6.34-rc3-03375-ga4fbf84-dirty/build/vmlinux
> > 2323.00 4.4% acpi_os_read_port /lib/modules/2.6.34-rc3-03375-ga4fbf84-dirty/build/vmlinux
> > 1641.00 3.1% _raw_spin_lock_irqsave /lib/modules/2.6.34-rc3-03375-ga4fbf84-dirty/build/vmlinux
> > 1260.00 2.4% schedule /lib/modules/2.6.34-rc3-03375-ga4fbf84-dirty/build/vmlinux
> > 1159.00 2.2% _raw_spin_lock /lib/modules/2.6.34-rc3-03375-ga4fbf84-dirty/build/vmlinux
> > 1051.00 2.0% tcp_ack /lib/modules/2.6.34-rc3-03375-ga4fbf84-dirty/build/vmlinux
> > 991.00 1.9% tcp_sendmsg /lib/modules/2.6.34-rc3-03375-ga4fbf84-dirty/build/vmlinux
> > 922.00 1.8% tcp_recvmsg /lib/modules/2.6.34-rc3-03375-ga4fbf84-dirty/build/vmlinux
> > 821.00 1.6% child_run /usr/bin/tbench
> > 766.00 1.5% all_string_sub /usr/bin/tbench
> > 630.00 1.2% __switch_to /lib/modules/2.6.34-rc3-03375-ga4fbf84-dirty/build/vmlinux
> > 608.00 1.2% __GI_strchr /lib/tls/libc-2.3.4.so
> > 606.00 1.2% ipt_do_table /lib/modules/2.6.34-rc3-03375-ga4fbf84-dirty/build/vmlinux
> > 600.00 1.1% __GI_strstr /lib/tls/libc-2.3.4.so
> > 556.00 1.1% __netif_receive_skb /lib/modules/2.6.34-rc3-03375-ga4fbf84-dirty/build/vmlinux
> > 504.00 1.0% tcp_transmit_skb /lib/modules/2.6.34-rc3-03375-ga4fbf84-dirty/build/vmlinux
> > 502.00 1.0% tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick /lib/modules/2.6.34-rc3-03375-ga4fbf84-dirty/build/vmlinux
> > 481.00 0.9% _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore /lib/modules/2.6.34-rc3-03375-ga4fbf84-dirty/build/vmlinux
> > 473.00 0.9% next_token /usr/bin/tbench
> > 449.00 0.9% ip_rcv /lib/modules/2.6.34-rc3-03375-ga4fbf84-dirty/build/vmlinux
> > 423.00 0.8% call_function_single_interrupt /lib/modules/2.6.34-rc3-03375-ga4fbf84-dirty/build/vmlinux
> > 422.00 0.8% ia32_sysenter_target /lib/modules/2.6.34-rc3-03375-ga4fbf84-dirty/build/vmlinux
> > 420.00 0.8% compat_sys_socketcall /lib/modules/2.6.34-rc3-03375-ga4fbf84-dirty/build/vmlinux
> > 401.00 0.8% mod_timer /lib/modules/2.6.34-rc3-03375-ga4fbf84-dirty/build/vmlinux
> > 400.00 0.8% process_backlog /lib/modules/2.6.34-rc3-03375-ga4fbf84-dirty/build/vmlinux
> > 399.00 0.8% ip_queue_xmit /lib/modules/2.6.34-rc3-03375-ga4fbf84-dirty/build/vmlinux
> > 387.00 0.7% select_task_rq_fair /lib/modules/2.6.34-rc3-03375-ga4fbf84-dirty/build/vmlinux
> > 377.00 0.7% _raw_spin_lock_bh /lib/modules/2.6.34-rc3-03375-ga4fbf84-dirty/build/vmlinux
> > 360.00 0.7% tcp_v4_rcv /lib/modules/2.6.34-rc3-03375-ga4fbf84-dirty/build/vmlinux
> >
> > But if RFS is on, why activating rps_cpus change tbench ?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists