[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 10:26:14 -0700
From: Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: hadi@...erus.ca, Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>,
Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
robert@...julf.net, andi@...stfloor.org
Subject: Re: rps perfomance WAS(Re: rps: question
> Tom, I am not sure what you describe is even respected for NAPI devices.
> (I hope you use napi devices in your company ;) )
>
> If we enqueue a skb to backlog, we also link our backlog napi into our
> poll_list, if not already there.
>
> So the loop in net_rx_action() will make us handle our backlog napi a
> bit after this network device napi (if time limit of 2 jiffies not
> elapsed) and *before* sending IPIS to remote cpus anyway.
>
Then I think that's a bug you've identified ;-)
>
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists