[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1271642970.3899.13.camel@bigi>
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 22:09:30 -0400
From: jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>, Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, therbert@...gle.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, robert@...julf.net, andi@...stfloor.org
Subject: Re: rps perfomance WAS(Re: rps: question
Thanks Eric. I tried to visualize your results - attached.
There are 2-3 odd numbers (labelled with *) but other
than that results are as expected...
I did run some experiments with some udp sink server
and i saw the IPIs amortized; unfortunately sky2 h/ware
proved to be bottleneck (at > 750Kpps incoming, it started
dropping and wasnt recording the drops, so i had to slow things down). I
need to digest my results a little more - but it seems i was getting
better throughput results with RPS (i.e it was able to sink
more packets)..
cheers,
jamal
Download attachment "erichw.pdf" of type "application/pdf" (187023 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists