lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <k2u412e6f7f1004190248s8ac633beof2475645e799f2ea@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 19 Apr 2010 17:48:39 +0800
From:	Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] rps: shortcut net_rps_action()

On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> net_rps_action() is a bit expensive on NR_CPUS=64..4096 kernels, even if
> RPS is not active.
>
> I add a flag to scan cpumask only if at least one IPI was scheduled.
> Even cpumask_weight() might be expensive on some setups, where
> nr_cpumask_bits could be very big (4096 for example)

How about using a array to save the cpu IDs. The number of CPUs, to
which the IPI will be sent, should be small.

-- 
Regards,
Changli Gao(xiaosuo@...il.com)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ