netdev - Re: [PATCH v5] rfs: Receive Flow Steering

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1271709121.3845.94.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date:	Mon, 19 Apr 2010 22:32:01 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	therbert@...gle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] rfs: Receive Flow Steering

Le lundi 19 avril 2010 à 13:23 -0700, David Miller a écrit :
> From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 13:09:05 -0700 (PDT)
> 
> > net-next-2.6 + Eric's port hashing patch, rps_cpus="ffffffff,ffffffff,ffffffff,ffffffff"
> > 
> > tbench 64: Throughput 1593.13 MB/sec 64 procs
> > tbench 128: Throughput 2367.27 MB/sec 128 procs
> 
> Eric, I think there is agreement that your patch is not a bad idea.
> 
> Your original posting had whitespace damange in the patch plus I want
> to see a proper commit message and signoff, so could you please submit
> this formally?

Hmm, this was not a formal patch, just an information.

Problem is if hardware provides rxhash, will it be "consistent" too ?



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html