netdev - Re: [PATCH v5] rfs: Receive Flow Steering

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <y2u412e6f7f1004191638mee9206dfoab7482bbff83e38d@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 20 Apr 2010 07:38:17 +0800
From:	Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, therbert@...gle.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] rfs: Receive Flow Steering

On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 4:32 AM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Hmm, this was not a formal patch, just an information.
>
> Problem is if hardware provides rxhash, will it be "consistent" too ?
>
>

Does this problem has relationship with your patch? No. If the rxhash
isn't provided by hardware, we can get more throughput from you patch,
and on the other side, we don't lose anything but potential more hash
collision.

-- 
Regards，
Changli Gao(xiaosuo@...il.com)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html