netdev - Re: IPv6: race condition in __ipv6_ifa_notify() and dst

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1271797043.7895.320.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date:	Tue, 20 Apr 2010 22:57:23 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Jiri Bohac <jbohac@...e.cz>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Subject: Re: IPv6: race condition in __ipv6_ifa_notify() and dst_free() ?

Le mardi 20 avril 2010 à 22:49 +0200, Jiri Bohac a écrit :
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 07:57:27PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > Le mardi 20 avril 2010 à 19:44 +0200, Jiri Bohac a écrit :
> > > --- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c	2010-04-17 00:12:32.000000000 +0200
> > > +++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c	2010-04-20 19:07:35.000000000 +0200
> > > @@ -3974,8 +3974,7 @@ static void __ipv6_ifa_notify(int event,
> > >  			addrconf_leave_anycast(ifp);
> > >  		addrconf_leave_solict(ifp->idev, &ifp->addr);
> > >  		dst_hold(&ifp->rt->u.dst);
> > > -		if (ip6_del_rt(ifp->rt))
> > > -			dst_free(&ifp->rt->u.dst);
> > > +		ip6_del_rt(ifp->rt);
> > >  		break;
> > >  	}
> > >  }
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > I dont understand the problem Jiri.
> > 
> > We just did dst_hold(&ifp->rt->u.dst), so if ip6_del_rt() fails we must
> > dst_free(), or we leak a refcount.
> 
> Well, no ... dst_free() does not decrement the refcount.
> The "opposite" of dst_hold() is dst_release(). And it does not
> automatically call dst_free() when the refcount drops to 0.
> dst_free() needs to be called explicitly and it apparently
> expects the caller to ensure that two dst_free()s won't be called
> simultaneously. But my bonding example shows this is not the
> case.
> 
> 

Ah yes you're right

Maybe ask Stephen ?

commit 93fa159abe50d3c55c7f83622d3f5c09b6e06f4b
Author: stephen hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Date:   Mon Apr 12 05:41:31 2010 +0000

    IPv6: keep route for tentative address
    
    Recent changes preserve IPv6 address when link goes down (good).
    But would cause address to point to dead dst entry (bad).
    The simplest fix is to just not delete route if address is
    being held for later use.
    
    Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
    Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>

diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
index 1b00bfe..a9913d2 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
@@ -4047,7 +4047,8 @@ static void __ipv6_ifa_notify(int event, struct
inet6_ifaddr *ifp)
                        addrconf_leave_anycast(ifp);
                addrconf_leave_solict(ifp->idev, &ifp->addr);
                dst_hold(&ifp->rt->u.dst);
-               if (ip6_del_rt(ifp->rt))
+
+               if (ifp->dead && ip6_del_rt(ifp->rt))
                        dst_free(&ifp->rt->u.dst);
                break;
        }


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html