| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1271887029.7895.3535.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 23:57:09 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Miles Lane <miles.lane@...il.com>, Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, vgoyal@...hat.com,
nauman@...gle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RCU: don't turn off lockdep when find suspicious
rcu_dereference_check() usage
Le mercredi 21 avril 2010 à 14:35 -0700, Paul E. McKenney a écrit :
> > [ 33.425087] [ INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage. ]
> > [ 33.425090] ---------------------------------------------------
> > [ 33.425094] net/core/dev.c:1993 invoked rcu_dereference_check()
> > without protection!
> > [ 33.425098]
> > [ 33.425098] other info that might help us debug this:
> > [ 33.425100]
> > [ 33.425103]
> > [ 33.425104] rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 1
> > [ 33.425108] 2 locks held by canberra-gtk-pl/4208:
> > [ 33.425111] #0: (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.+.}, at:
> > [<ffffffff81394ffd>] inet_stream_connect+0x3a/0x24d
> > [ 33.425125] #1: (rcu_read_lock_bh){.+....}, at:
> > [<ffffffff8134a809>] dev_queue_xmit+0x14e/0x4b8
> > [ 33.425137]
> > [ 33.425138] stack backtrace:
> > [ 33.425142] Pid: 4208, comm: canberra-gtk-pl Not tainted 2.6.34-rc5 #18
> > [ 33.425146] Call Trace:
> > [ 33.425154] [<ffffffff81067fc2>] lockdep_rcu_dereference+0x9d/0xa5
> > [ 33.425161] [<ffffffff8134a914>] dev_queue_xmit+0x259/0x4b8
> > [ 33.425167] [<ffffffff8134a809>] ? dev_queue_xmit+0x14e/0x4b8
> > [ 33.425173] [<ffffffff81041c52>] ? _local_bh_enable_ip+0xcd/0xda
> > [ 33.425180] [<ffffffff8135375a>] neigh_resolve_output+0x234/0x285
> > [ 33.425188] [<ffffffff8136f71f>] ip_finish_output2+0x257/0x28c
> > [ 33.425193] [<ffffffff8136f7bc>] ip_finish_output+0x68/0x6a
> > [ 33.425198] [<ffffffff813704b3>] T.866+0x52/0x59
> > [ 33.425203] [<ffffffff813706fe>] ip_output+0xaa/0xb4
> > [ 33.425209] [<ffffffff8136ebb8>] ip_local_out+0x20/0x24
> > [ 33.425215] [<ffffffff8136f204>] ip_queue_xmit+0x309/0x368
> > [ 33.425223] [<ffffffff810e41e6>] ? __kmalloc_track_caller+0x111/0x155
> > [ 33.425230] [<ffffffff813831ef>] ? tcp_connect+0x223/0x3d3
> > [ 33.425236] [<ffffffff81381971>] tcp_transmit_skb+0x707/0x745
> > [ 33.425243] [<ffffffff81383342>] tcp_connect+0x376/0x3d3
> > [ 33.425250] [<ffffffff81268ac3>] ? secure_tcp_sequence_number+0x55/0x6f
> > [ 33.425256] [<ffffffff813872f0>] tcp_v4_connect+0x3df/0x455
> > [ 33.425263] [<ffffffff8133cbd9>] ? lock_sock_nested+0xf3/0x102
> > [ 33.425269] [<ffffffff81395067>] inet_stream_connect+0xa4/0x24d
> > [ 33.425276] [<ffffffff8133b418>] sys_connect+0x90/0xd0
> > [ 33.425283] [<ffffffff81002b9c>] ? sysret_check+0x27/0x62
> > [ 33.425289] [<ffffffff81068922>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x114/0x13f
> > [ 33.425296] [<ffffffff813ced00>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f
> > [ 33.425303] [<ffffffff81002b6b>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
>
> This looks like an rcu_dereference() needs to instead be
> rcu_dereference_bh(), but the line numbering in my version of
> net/core/dev.c does not match yours. CCing netdev, hopefully
> someone there will know which rcu_dereference() is indicated.
>
This is already sorted out in David trees
> > [ 85.939528] [ INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage. ]
> > [ 85.939531] ---------------------------------------------------
> > [ 85.939535] include/net/inet_timewait_sock.h:227 invoked
> > rcu_dereference_check() without protection!
> > [ 85.939539]
> > [ 85.939540] other info that might help us debug this:
> > [ 85.939541]
> > [ 85.939544]
> > [ 85.939545] rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 1
> > [ 85.939549] 2 locks held by gwibber-service/4798:
> > [ 85.939552] #0: (&p->lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff811034b2>]
> > seq_read+0x37/0x381
> > [ 85.939566] #1: (&(&hashinfo->ehash_locks[i])->rlock){+.-...},
> > at: [<ffffffff81386355>] established_get_next+0xc4/0x132
> > [ 85.939579]
> > [ 85.939580] stack backtrace:
> > [ 85.939585] Pid: 4798, comm: gwibber-service Not tainted 2.6.34-rc5 #18
> > [ 85.939588] Call Trace:
> > [ 85.939598] [<ffffffff81067fc2>] lockdep_rcu_dereference+0x9d/0xa5
> > [ 85.939604] [<ffffffff81385018>] twsk_net+0x4f/0x57
> > [ 85.939610] [<ffffffff813862e5>] established_get_next+0x54/0x132
> > [ 85.939615] [<ffffffff813864c7>] tcp_seq_next+0x5d/0x6a
> > [ 85.939621] [<ffffffff81103701>] seq_read+0x286/0x381
> > [ 85.939627] [<ffffffff8110347b>] ? seq_read+0x0/0x381
> > [ 85.939633] [<ffffffff81133240>] proc_reg_read+0x8d/0xac
> > [ 85.939640] [<ffffffff810ea110>] vfs_read+0xa6/0x103
> > [ 85.939645] [<ffffffff810ea223>] sys_read+0x45/0x69
> > [ 85.939652] [<ffffffff81002b6b>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
>
> This one appears to be a case of missing rcu_read_lock(), but it is
> not clear to me at what level it needs to go.
>
> Eric, any enlightenment on this one and the next one?
>
Coming from commit b099ce2602d806deb41caaa578731848995cdb2a
>>From Eric Biederman (CCed)
Apparently he added rcu to twsk_net(), but Changelog doesnt mention it.
> > [ 87.296366] [ INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage. ]
> > [ 87.296369] ---------------------------------------------------
> > [ 87.296373] include/net/inet_timewait_sock.h:227 invoked
> > rcu_dereference_check() without protection!
> > [ 87.296377]
> > [ 87.296377] other info that might help us debug this:
> > [ 87.296379]
> > [ 87.296382]
> > [ 87.296383] rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 1
> > [ 87.296386] no locks held by gwibber-service/4803.
> > [ 87.296389]
> > [ 87.296390] stack backtrace:
> > [ 87.296395] Pid: 4803, comm: gwibber-service Not tainted 2.6.34-rc5 #18
> > [ 87.296398] Call Trace:
> > [ 87.296411] [<ffffffff81067fc2>] lockdep_rcu_dereference+0x9d/0xa5
> > [ 87.296419] [<ffffffff813733d3>] twsk_net+0x4f/0x57
> > [ 87.296424] [<ffffffff813737f3>] __inet_twsk_hashdance+0x50/0x158
> > [ 87.296431] [<ffffffff81389239>] tcp_time_wait+0x1c1/0x24b
> > [ 87.296437] [<ffffffff8137c417>] tcp_fin+0x83/0x162
> > [ 87.296443] [<ffffffff8137cda7>] tcp_data_queue+0x1ff/0xa1e
> > [ 87.296450] [<ffffffff810495c6>] ? mod_timer+0x1e/0x20
> > [ 87.296456] [<ffffffff813809e3>] tcp_rcv_state_process+0x89d/0x8f2
> > [ 87.296463] [<ffffffff8133ca0b>] ? release_sock+0x30/0x10b
> > [ 87.296468] [<ffffffff81386df2>] tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x2de/0x33f
> > [ 87.296475] [<ffffffff8133ca5d>] release_sock+0x82/0x10b
> > [ 87.296481] [<ffffffff81376ef5>] tcp_close+0x1b5/0x37e
> > [ 87.296487] [<ffffffff81395437>] inet_release+0x50/0x57
> > [ 87.296493] [<ffffffff8133a134>] sock_release+0x1a/0x66
> > [ 87.296498] [<ffffffff8133a1a2>] sock_close+0x22/0x26
> > [ 87.296505] [<ffffffff810eb003>] __fput+0x120/0x1cd
> > [ 87.296510] [<ffffffff810eb0c5>] fput+0x15/0x17
> > [ 87.296516] [<ffffffff810e7f3d>] filp_close+0x63/0x6d
> > [ 87.296521] [<ffffffff810e801e>] sys_close+0xd7/0x111
> > [ 87.296528] [<ffffffff81002b6b>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
>
> commit d3b8ba1bde9afb7d50cf0712f9d95317ea66c06f
> Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Date: Wed Apr 21 14:04:56 2010 -0700
>
> sched: protect __sched_setscheduler() access to cgroups
>
> A given task's cgroups structures must remain while that task is running
> due to reference counting, so this is presumably a false positive.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
> index 14c44ec..1d43c1a 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -4575,9 +4575,11 @@ recheck:
> * Do not allow realtime tasks into groups that have no runtime
> * assigned.
> */
> + rcu_read_lock();
> if (rt_bandwidth_enabled() && rt_policy(policy) &&
> task_group(p)->rt_bandwidth.rt_runtime == 0)
> return -EPERM;
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> #endif
>
> retval = security_task_setscheduler(p, policy, param);
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists