[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100420.190414.252166338.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 19:04:14 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: zbr@...emap.net
Cc: eric.dumazet@...il.com, greearb@...delatech.com,
gasparch@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PROBLEM: Linux kernel 2.6.31 IPv4 TCP fails to open huge
amount of outgoing connections (unable to bind ... )
From: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 04:30:22 +0400
> To return back to exponential bind() times you need to revert the whole
> original patch including magic 5 number, not only bsockets.
Indeed, if we keep that '5' thing there it's just going to still fail
similarly.
> But actual problem is not in this digit, but in a deeper logic.
> Previously we scanned the whole table, now we have 5 attempts to
> find out at least one bucket (without conflict) we will insert
> new socket into. Apparently for large number of addresses it is possible
> that all 5 times we will randomly select those buckets which conflicts.
> As dumb solution we can increase 'attempt' number to infinite one, or
> fallback to whole-table-search after several random attempts, which is a
> bit more clever I think.
If random number generator is not too terrible, just using infinite
limit would be roughly equivalent.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists