netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/2] ehea: error handling improvement

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100420.191602.228303800.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Tue, 20 Apr 2010 19:16:02 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	osstklei@...ibm.com
Cc:	raisch@...ibm.com, themann@...ibm.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ehea: error handling improvement

From: Thomas Klein <osstklei@...ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 14:08:11 +0200

> Reset a port's resources only if they're actually in an error state
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Klein <tklein@...ibm.com>
> ---
> 
> Patch created against 2.6.34-rc4

There are several problems with these patches:

1) They are corrupted by your email client, lines unchanged
   begin with one space character instead of two.  Therefore
   even 'patch' wouldn't accept these changes.

2) The double slash in the patch file paths make git not
   accept the change.  Please don't put double-slashes in
   your patch paths as that canonically means "/".

3) These are not appropriate for net-2.6 as we are deep in
   the -rcX series at this point and only the most diabolical
   bug fixes are appropriate.  Therefore, please generate these
   against net-next-2.6, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html