[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100422.143805.95887767.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 14:38:05 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: shemminger@...tta.com
Cc: pekkas@...core.fi, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, nick@...x.ie,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] IPv6: Generic TTL Security Mechanism (original
version)
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 09:23:05 -0700
> Dave: Yoshifuji and I agree this is the best solution, how come the patch
> hasn't been applied?
You supplied 3 different implementations, that puts all of them
into "RFC" state in patchwork.
When you figure out which one is best you make a new explicit
submission of the implementation you think should actually
go into the tree.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists