[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100423021000.GA21777@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 10:10:00 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: jbohac@...e.cz, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
shemminger@...tta.com
Subject: Re: IPv6: race condition in __ipv6_ifa_notify() and dst_free() ?
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 06:54:00PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Jiri Bohac <jbohac@...e.cz>
> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 17:49:08 +0200
>
> > I still don't see why __ipv6_ifa_notify() needs to call
> > dst_free(). Shouldn't that be dst_release() instead, to drop the
> > reference obtained by dst_hold(&ifp->rt->u.dst)?
>
> It likely wants to do both.
Actually I don't think the problem is in __ipv6_ifa_notify. The
fact is none of this stuff is meant to be idempotent. So it's
up to the entity that is requesting the deletion to make sure that
a single object is not deleted more than once.
Yes the original symptom was in __ipv6_ifa_notify, but it is
merely pointing out that we have a problem further up.
My patch is indeed not sufficient as Jiri pointed out, because
I didn't deal with the case of an administrative deletion of
autmatically generated IPv6 addresses.
I will post an updated patch later today to deal with that.
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists