[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100423.011456.48472321.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 01:14:56 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NIU support for skb->rxhash
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 14:19:22 -0700 (PDT)
> Also I have some ideas about what we can do if we have
> just the rxhash. It seems we can avoid the type_trans
> overhead on the interrupting cpu.
>
> Things like eth_type_trans() become a netdev operation rather than
> something drivers statically call by hand. ->ndo_type_trans or
> similar.
>
> SKB has a state bit saying whether ->ndo_type_trans has been invoked
> yet on RX.
>
> Drivers pass raw SKBs up into the stack.
>
> We defer the ->ndo_type_trans as far as possible, for RPS when we have
> ->rxhash we can defer this all the way to the destination RPS cpu.
>
> If we lack ->rxhash, the source cpu will need to invoke
> ->ndo_type_trans before it can begin parsing the packet.
I looked into implementing this and it doesn't work. The
problem is GRO want's to look into the packet very early
and we want to batch GRO a set of packets into a big packet
before shooting them over to a remote cpu.
This reminds me that we can start using ->rxhash as a quick
mismatch check in the GRO flow matcher.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists