[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100424113629.0ad3569b@linux.intel.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 11:36:29 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] e100: Fix the TX workqueue race
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 16:35:45 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 16:31:27 -0700 (PDT)
>
> > I'll apply this to net-2.6, thanks Alan.
>
> Nevermind...
>
> Doesn't apply to net-2.6, but even when I fix that up it doesn't
> even compile. There is no 'dev' variable present etc.
>
> You even use a combination of "dev" and "netdev" in the resulting
> code block.
>
> If it doesn't even build, I doubt it's been tested either.
Puzzling as it came from a building -next tree. Will see whats happened
next week if I get time, but I'm afraid net stuff isn't a priority - in
fact its disappointing that having diagnosed a bug months ago (which
was the hard bit) and posted a test patch months ago the maintainers
haven't fixed it.
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists