[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100424.200011.226755248.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 20:00:11 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: alan@...ux.intel.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] e100: Fix the TX workqueue race
From: Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 11:36:29 +0100
> Puzzling as it came from a building -next tree. Will see whats
> happened next week if I get time, but I'm afraid net stuff isn't a
> priority - in fact its disappointing that having diagnosed a bug
> months ago (which was the hard bit) and posted a test patch months
> ago the maintainers haven't fixed it.
It's disappointing to me that someone as experienced and skilled
as yourself can't generate a clean patch which is 1) against
the appropriate tree for a bug fix and 2) actually compiles.
Or is this too much to ask? :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists