lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20100425235549.GB2550@sysclose.org> Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 20:55:49 -0300 From: Flavio Leitner <fbl@...close.org> To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> Cc: ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi, eric.dumazet@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] TCP: avoid to send keepalive probes if it is receiving data On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:42:05PM -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi> > Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 23:34:15 +0300 (EEST) > > > I fail to see why the addition of this new variable is necessary at all, > > could either of you enlight me why exactly it's necessary and rcv_tstamp > > will not suffice? > > I agree, the existing rcv_tstamp should serve this purpose just > fine. I thought it would break TCP_INFO/tcp_get_info(). Actually, reviewing the code again I found another variable which does exactly what is needed. I'll post a new patch for review. thanks, -- Flavio -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists