[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100426.002240.197722540.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 00:22:40 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc: xiaosuo@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: reimplement completion_queue as a FIFO queue
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 09:21:49 +0200
> Le dimanche 25 avril 2010 à 23:27 -0700, David Miller a écrit :
>
>> No matter what is faster, we have to process packets in
>> FIFO order, otherwise we get reordering within a flow
>> which is to be absolutely avoided.
>
> Hmm, completion queue is about freeing skb, and its name is misleading.
>
> This queue is feed by dev_kfree_skb_irq() only
Ok I see, thanks for explaining.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists