[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100426182752.GA23633@vigoh>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 15:27:52 -0300
From: "Gustavo F. Padovan" <gustavo@...ovan.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: error27@...il.com, marcel@...tmann.org,
andrei.emeltchenko@...ia.com, linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch v2] bluetooth: handle l2cap_create_connless_pdu() errors
Hi David,
* David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> [2010-04-26 11:12:59 -0700]:
> From: "Gustavo F. Padovan" <gustavo@...ovan.org>
> Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 12:09:19 -0300
>
> > Hi Dan,
> >
> > * Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com> [2010-04-26 13:36:27 +0200]:
> >
> >> l2cap_create_connless_pdu() can sometimes return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM) or
> >> ERR_PTR(-EFAULT).
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
> >> ---
> >> In v2 I wrote the patch on top of Gustavo Padovon's devel tree
>
> This is the kind of bug that could cause a crash if the path actually
> executes.
>
> Therefore it tires me that that submitter was told to regenerate this
> patch against some devel tree that is -next bound, when in fact this
> is the kind of fix that warrants inclusion right now into net-2.6
My bad here. So I think we should pick the first version of the Dan's patch.
It applies against bluetooth-testing right now and then against net-2.6 too.
Marcel, is that ok to you?
>
> Marcel, please do whatever magic you need to so I can get this into
> Linus's tree as I did the rest of the ERR_PTR() fixes from Dan already.
> No reason to treat Bluetooth special and defer these fixes to -next.
>
> Thanks.
--
Gustavo F. Padovan
http://padovan.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists