[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <C7FB3747.2BAAA%scofeldm@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 12:27:51 -0700
From: Scott Feldman <scofeldm@...co.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <chrisw@...hat.com>, <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH 1/2] Add ndo_set_vf_port_profile
On 4/24/10 12:19 AM, "David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>> int (*ndo_set_vf_tx_rate)(struct net_device *dev,
>> int vf, int rate);
>> + int (*ndo_set_vf_port_profile)(
>> + struct net_device *dev, int vf,
>> + u8 *port_profile, u8 *mac,
>> + u8 *host_uuid,
>> + u8 *client_uuid,
>> + u8 *client_name);
>> int (*ndo_get_vf_config)(struct net_device *dev,
>
> Just pass the "struct ifla_vf_port_profile *" instead of tons of
> arguments.
Ok
> Also, I think it's reasonable to fetch the current profile in use, so
> GETLINK ought to report these things. To make it generic we can
> maintain the settings given to us in software, hung off of the netdev
> struct, and simply report that during GETLINK.
We'd need an array of struct ifla_vf_port_profile hanging off of netdev, one
element for each VF. That seems like a lot of mem hanging off of netdev,
and we'd have to define a MAX_VF to size the array. How about a
ndo_get_vf_port_profile() that the netdev fills in, and the netdev keeps the
data in it's private area? That's how ndo_get_vf_config() is working.
-scott
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists