[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <u2u412e6f7f1004291607j4b7b9c3ct4fb78de7bffc7fc0@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 07:07:09 +0800
From: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: hadi@...erus.ca, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
therbert@...gle.com, shemminger@...tta.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Eilon Greenstein <eilong@...adcom.com>,
Brian Bloniarz <bmb@...enacr.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: speedup udp receive path
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 8:45 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Changli, I wonder how you can cook "performance" patches without testing
> them at all for real... This cannot be true ?
>
I am sorry. But I wasn't against your patch, and I just wanted to
understand the test result from jamal. It is my fault submitting a
performance patch without testing them. I should not reply on code
inspection for the performance patch.
--
Regards,
Changli Gao(xiaosuo@...il.com)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists