[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100430181946.GA26761@us.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 13:19:46 -0500
From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>
To: Dan Smith <danms@...ibm.com>
Cc: containers@...ts.osdl.org,
Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@...com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] C/R: inet4 and inet6 unicast routes (v2)
Quoting Dan Smith (danms@...ibm.com):
> +static int temp_netns_enter(struct net *net)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + struct net *tmp_netns;
> +
> + ret = copy_namespaces(CLONE_NEWNET, current);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
Actually there is one problem here - copy_namespaces() is
specifically used only by clone() and it expects tsk to
not yet be live. So it just does
tsk->nsproxy = new_ns
Since you're doing this on current which is live, it would
have to use rcu_assign_pointer() to be safe.
So I'm afraid you're going to have to do a slightly uglier
thing where you unshare_nsproxy_namespaces() and then
switch_task_namespaces() to the new nsproxy.
> +
> + tmp_netns = current->nsproxy->net_ns;
> + get_net(net);
> + current->nsproxy->net_ns = net;
> + put_net(tmp_netns);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
Otherwise it looks good to me. My only other comment would be to soothe
readers' anxieties by putting a comment right here explaining that
switch_task_namespaces() will drop your ref to current->nsproxy->net_ns,
and that you had never dropped the ref to prev so it will be safe.
> +static void temp_netns_exit(struct nsproxy *prev)
> +{
> + switch_task_namespaces(current, prev);
> +}
thanks,
-serge
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists