netdev - Re: [PATCH] [RFC] C/R: inet4 and inet6 unicast routes (v2)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100430183702.GA29585@us.ibm.com>
Date:	Fri, 30 Apr 2010 13:37:02 -0500
From:	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>
To:	Dan Smith <danms@...ibm.com>
Cc:	containers@...ts.osdl.org,
	Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@...com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] C/R: inet4 and inet6 unicast routes (v2)

Quoting Dan Smith (danms@...ibm.com):
> SH> So I'm afraid you're going to have to do a slightly uglier thing
> SH> where you unshare_nsproxy_namespaces() and then
> SH> switch_task_namespaces() to the new nsproxy.
> 
> Well, I think that would be hidden in the nicer helper function I
> think I'll need, which I eluded to in the patch header.  This is just
> an RFC proof that it can be done in this manner, but I think a
> separate helper in nsproxy.c is in order to make it nice (and avoid
> the extra alloc/free of the netns that copy_namespaces() will create).
> Agreed?

Yup - thanks!

-serge
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html