[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1272697367.2230.106.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Sat, 01 May 2010 09:02:47 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: hadi@...erus.ca, xiaosuo@...il.com, therbert@...gle.com,
shemminger@...tta.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, eilong@...adcom.com,
bmb@...enacr.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: sock_def_readable() and friends RCU
conversion
Le vendredi 30 avril 2010 à 16:35 -0700, David Miller a écrit :
> From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 23:01:49 +0200
>
> > [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: sock_def_readable() and friends RCU conversion
>
> So what's the difference between call_rcu() freeing this little waitqueue
> struct and doing it for the entire socket?
>
> We'll still be doing an RCU call every socket destroy, and now we also have
> a new memory allocation/free per connection.
>
> This has to show up in things like 'lat_connect' and friends, does it not?
Before patch :
lat_connect -N 10 127.0.0.1
TCP/IP connection cost to 127.0.0.1: 27.8872 microseconds
After :
lat_connect -N 10 127.0.0.1
TCP/IP connection cost to 127.0.0.1: 20.7681 microseconds
Strange isnt it ?
(special care should be taken with this bench, as it leave many sockets
in TIME_WAIT state, so to get consistent numbers we have to wait a while
before restarting it)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists