[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BDB8BA7.1040100@cs.columbia.edu>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 22:02:15 -0400
From: Oren Laadan <orenl@...columbia.edu>
To: Dan Smith <danms@...ibm.com>
CC: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...e.fr>, containers@...ts.osdl.org,
Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@...com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] C/R: inet4 and inet6 unicast routes (v2)
Dan Smith wrote:
> DL> Is it possible to enter the namespace and dump / restore the
> DL> routes with NETLINK_ROUTE from userspace ? Or is it something not
> DL> possible ?
>
> I'm sure it would be doable. However, checkpointing the routes that
> way would:
>
> (a) Be inconsistent with how we checkpoint all the other resources,
> including the other network resources we handle from the kernel
> with rtnl
> (b) Require merging of the data from the resources saved in userspace
> with those saved in kernelspace
See below suggestion for userspace.
> (c) Eliminate the ability for an application to easily checkpoint
> itself by making a single syscall
I can't think of a use-case of a networked application that takes
a checkpoint of itself (including live network).
Anyway, it's can still be useful to at least do the restore from
userspace (while checkpoint is done in kernel - like with pids).
We may reduce the complexity of restore (in kernel) greatly.
(BTW, instead of syscall one could have a library call that will
take care of the userspace "work").
> (d) Require this same sort of jumping back and forth between
> namespaces by the userspace task doing the checkpoint/restart
>
I wonder: if we could relatively simply recreate the network ns,
the interfaces in them, and then restore the routing information
all from userspace before calling sys_restart, it may be useful
in simplifying the kernel code, and allowing more flexibility for
userspace alterations.
I definitely should have asked the question much earlier when you
started the work on restoring network ns and interfaces ... (oh,
I reckon it's better late than never).
Just tossing out the idea, see what kind of thoughts it evokes.
Most likely I'll get a "that won't work because ...", but I'm
hoping for a "hmm.. maybe.. let me see.." :)
Oren.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists