lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1272828143.2173.150.camel@edumazet-laptop> Date: Sun, 02 May 2010 21:22:23 +0200 From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, hadi@...erus.ca, xiaosuo@...il.com, therbert@...gle.com, shemminger@...tta.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, lenb@...nel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] net: batch skb dequeueing from softnet input_pkt_queue Le dimanche 02 mai 2010 à 10:54 -0700, Arjan van de Ven a écrit : > On Sun, 02 May 2010 16:27:28 +0200 > Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote: > > > C2 latency seems to be 64 (us ?), while C1 seems to be 1 > > the processor_idle module has a "latency_factor" module parameter. > The default is 2, but sometimes people think 6 is a better value... > .. any chance you can try that value ? > I tried 6 and 20, nothing changed ;( > Also, I'm starting to wonder if Andi's patch to use io_schedule() needs > to be replaced with a net_schedule() kind of thing. The cpuidle code > currently has a weight factor for IO (based on measuring/experiments), > and maybe networking really needs another factor... so just having a > parallel concept with a different weight could be the right answer for > that. > But a task blocked on disk IO is probably blocked for a small amount of time, while on network, it can be for a long time. I am not sure its the right metric. I was expecting something based on recent history. Say if we have 20.000 wakeups per second, most likely we should not enter C2/C3 states... > > we'll fix powertop to report the marketing name soon. > > Ah, I see, thanks :) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists