[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1272836755.2173.153.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Sun, 02 May 2010 23:45:55 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, hadi@...erus.ca,
xiaosuo@...il.com, therbert@...gle.com, shemminger@...tta.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, lenb@...nel.org, arjan@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] net: batch skb dequeueing from softnet
input_pkt_queue
Le dimanche 02 mai 2010 à 23:25 +0200, Andi Kleen a écrit :
> It's pointless to send an IPI to your thread sibling for this.
> Everything it could do you can do yourself too with the same performance.
>
> -Andi
Amen
Tests just prove the reverse.
I have some collegues that disable HyperThreading for exact same
reasons. I wonder why Intel designed HT. Should be marketing I guess.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists