[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100503032227.268613ac@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 03:22:27 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, hadi@...erus.ca,
xiaosuo@...il.com, therbert@...gle.com, shemminger@...tta.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, lenb@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] net: batch skb dequeueing from softnet
input_pkt_queue
On Mon, 03 May 2010 07:17:14 +0200
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> Le dimanche 02 mai 2010 à 20:50 -0700, Arjan van de Ven a écrit :
>
> > we effectively do that. The thing is that C2 is so low cost normally
> > that it's still worth it even at 20k wakeups...
> >
> > this is where the bios tells us how "heavy" the states are....
> > and 64 usec... is just not very much.
>
> Maybe its low cost, (apparently, it is, since I can reach ~900.000
> ipis on my 16 cores machine) but multiply this by 16 or 32 or 64
> cpus, and clockevents_notify() cost appears to be a killer, all cpus
> compete on a single lock.
>
> Maybe this notifier could use RCU ?
could this be an artifact of the local apic stopping in deeper C states?
(which is finally fixed in the Westmere generation)
--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists