netdev - [PATCH] unix/garbage: kill copy of the skb queue walker

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1005031620130.7041@wel-95.cs.helsinki.fi>
Date:	Mon, 3 May 2010 16:22:18 +0300 (EEST)
From:	"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
cc:	Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] unix/garbage: kill copy of the skb queue walker

Worse yet, it seems that its arguments were in reverse order. Also
remove one related helper which seems hardly worth keeping.

Compile tested.

Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
---
 net/unix/garbage.c |   13 ++-----------
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/unix/garbage.c b/net/unix/garbage.c
index 14c22c3..c8df6fd 100644
--- a/net/unix/garbage.c
+++ b/net/unix/garbage.c
@@ -153,15 +153,6 @@ void unix_notinflight(struct file *fp)
 	}
 }
 
-static inline struct sk_buff *sock_queue_head(struct sock *sk)
-{
-	return (struct sk_buff *)&sk->sk_receive_queue;
-}
-
-#define receive_queue_for_each_skb(sk, next, skb) \
-	for (skb = sock_queue_head(sk)->next, next = skb->next; \
-	     skb != sock_queue_head(sk); skb = next, next = skb->next)
-
 static void scan_inflight(struct sock *x, void (*func)(struct unix_sock *),
 			  struct sk_buff_head *hitlist)
 {
@@ -169,7 +160,7 @@ static void scan_inflight(struct sock *x, void (*func)(struct unix_sock *),
 	struct sk_buff *next;
 
 	spin_lock(&x->sk_receive_queue.lock);
-	receive_queue_for_each_skb(x, next, skb) {
+	skb_queue_walk_safe(&x->sk_receive_queue, skb, next) {
 		/*
 		 *	Do we have file descriptors ?
 		 */
@@ -225,7 +216,7 @@ static void scan_children(struct sock *x, void (*func)(struct unix_sock *),
 		 * and perform a scan on them as well.
 		 */
 		spin_lock(&x->sk_receive_queue.lock);
-		receive_queue_for_each_skb(x, next, skb) {
+		skb_queue_walk_safe(&x->sk_receive_queue, skb, next) {
 			u = unix_sk(skb->sk);
 
 			/*
-- 
1.5.6.3