[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1272916166.27948.62.camel@localhost>
Date: Mon, 03 May 2010 20:49:26 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] network driver skb allocations
On Mon, 2010-05-03 at 19:06 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
[...]
> Current logic for drivers is to :
>
> allocate skbs (sk_buff + data) and put them in a ring buffer.
Not all of them.
> When rx interrupt comes, get the skb and give it to stack.
>
> Allocate a new skb (sk_buff + data) and put it in rx fat ring buffer (511 entries for tg3 )
>
> This is suboptimal, because sk_buff will probably be cold 512 rx later...
> Also, NUMA info might be wrong : sk_buff should be allocated on current node,
> not on the device preferred node.
This also avoids allocating sk_buffs that are never needed due to GRO or
scattering of jumbo frames.
> Drivers should allocate only the data part for NIC, and at the time of interrupt,
> allocate the skb_buff and link it to buffer filled by NIC.
I think we found that this increases latency, so sfc switches between
page and skb allocations dynamically.
Ben.
> With a prefetch(first_cache_line_of_data) before doing sk_buff allocation and init,
> eth_type_trans() / get_rps_cpus() would be much faster.
--
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists