[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100503.231743.20921751.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 03 May 2010 23:17:43 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc: shemminger@...tta.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: OOP in ip_cmsg_recv (net-next)
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 06:43:45 +0200
> David, if I am not mistaken (not thea yet for me this early morning) the
> tracer you mention is included in kfree_skb(), not in __kfree_skb() :
...
> I only copied part of consume_skb() which doesnt call
> trace_kfree_skb() :
...
> So I believe my second patch is a bit better : We dont even lock the
> socket in the (rare) case we should not orphan the skb ;)
Right you are.
> [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: skb_free_datagram_locked() fix
I'll apply this, thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists