[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100503181003.3764e625@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 18:10:03 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Brian Bloniarz <bmb@...enacr.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, hadi@...erus.ca,
xiaosuo@...il.com, therbert@...gle.com, shemminger@...tta.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, lenb@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] net: batch skb dequeueing from softnet
input_pkt_queue
On Mon, 03 May 2010 10:45:07 -0400
Brian Bloniarz <bmb@...enacr
> > so the hard problem is that on going idle, the local timers need to
> > be funneled to the external HPET. Afaik right now we use one
> > channel of the hpet, with the result that we have one global lock
> > for this.
>
> Does the HPET only need to be programmed when going idle?
correct; when going idle the per logical CPU timer value needs
to be put in the global HPET (assuming 1 channel is in use).
This "global" is where the lock comes in.
> That could mean that this isn't a big performance issue.
> cares if you spin for a while when you're about to sleep for
> at least 60usec?
depends on how long the sleep is ;-)
--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists