netdev - Re: TCP-MD5 checksum failure on x86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1272972722.2097.1.camel@achroite.uk.solarflarecom.com>
Date:	Tue, 04 May 2010 12:32:02 +0100
From:	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To:	Bhaskar Dutta <bhaskie@...il.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: TCP-MD5 checksum failure on x86_64 SMP

On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 09:00 +0530, Bhaskar Dutta wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I am observing intermittent TCP-MD5 checksum failures
> (CONFIG_TCP_MD5SIG)  on kernel 2.6.31 while talking to a BGP router.
> 
> The problem is only seen in multi-core 64 bit machines.
> Is there any known bug in the per_cpu_ptr implementation (I am aware
> that the percpu allocator has been re-implemented in 2.6.33) that
> might cause a corruption in 64 bit SMP machines?
> 
> Any pointers would be appreciated.

There was another recent report of incorrect MD5 signatures in
<http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/159556>, but without any
response.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html