[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 17:00:32 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM List <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Linux SCSI List <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Wireless List <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
DRI <dri-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: 2.6.34-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.33
On Tue, 4 May 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> Unresolved regressions
> ----------------------
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15880
> Subject : Very bad regression from 2.6.33 as of 1600f9def
> Submitter : Alex Elsayed <eternaleye@...il.com>
> Date : 2010-04-29 2:28 (6 days old)
> Message-ID : <loom.20100429T041908-663@...t.gmane.org>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127250825306178&w=2
This looks like it wasn't a regression, but some other compile/install
issue. See
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127274294422719&w=2
where he reports that his self-compiled 2.6.33 doesn't boot either.
There's some confusion about .config, but it might well be an install
problem too (in fact, that sounds more likely - the original bug-report
seems to reboot before the kernel has really even booted - it apparently
hasn't done the graphics mode switch by the early bootloader)
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists