netdev - Re: TCP-MD5 checksum failure on x86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 07 May 2010 10:55:09 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@...ia.com>
Cc:	Bhaskar Dutta <bhaskie@...il.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: TCP-MD5 checksum failure on x86_64 SMP

Le vendredi 07 mai 2010 à 11:46 +0300, Lars Eggert a écrit :
> On 2010-5-6, at 15:06, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > This code should be completely rewritten for linux-2.6.35, its very ugly
> > and over complex, yet it is not scalable.
> 
> Let me quickly point out that the IETF has recently replaced TCP-MD5 with TCP-AO (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-auth-opt-11) which is days or weeks away from being published as an RFC. (The draft has been approved and it waiting for the RFC Editor to finish the final copy-editing.)
> 
> You'll obviously still want TCP-MD5 support for talking to existing equipment, but significant cycles would IMO be better spent on TCP-AO.
> 

Thanks for this info !


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html