[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1273502195.2221.4.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 16:36:35 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Cc: Joakim Tjernlund <joakim.tjernlund@...nsmode.se>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: VLAN I/F's and TX queue.
Le lundi 10 mai 2010 à 16:26 +0200, Patrick McHardy a écrit :
>
> Is the intention just to avoid accounting the packet as dropped?
> That seems fine to me since in case of NET_XMIT_CN its actually
> not the currently transmitted packet that was dropped.
>
> But part of the intention of the above mentioned patch was actually
> to inform higher layers of congestion so they can take action if
> desired, which would be defeated by this patch.
>
I see, so maybe we want following patch instead ?
(letting NET_XMIT_CN be given to caller, but accounting current packet
as transmitted ?)
diff --git a/net/8021q/vlan_dev.c b/net/8021q/vlan_dev.c
index b5249c5..55be908 100644
--- a/net/8021q/vlan_dev.c
+++ b/net/8021q/vlan_dev.c
@@ -327,7 +327,7 @@ static netdev_tx_t vlan_dev_hard_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
len = skb->len;
ret = dev_queue_xmit(skb);
- if (likely(ret == NET_XMIT_SUCCESS)) {
+ if (likely(ret == NET_XMIT_SUCCESS || ret == NET_XMIT_CN)) {
txq->tx_packets++;
txq->tx_bytes += len;
} else
@@ -353,7 +353,7 @@ static netdev_tx_t vlan_dev_hwaccel_hard_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
len = skb->len;
ret = dev_queue_xmit(skb);
- if (likely(ret == NET_XMIT_SUCCESS)) {
+ if (likely(ret == NET_XMIT_SUCCESS || ret == NET_XMIT_CN)) {
txq->tx_packets++;
txq->tx_bytes += len;
} else
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists