[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BE83F02.3010204@candelatech.com>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 10:14:42 -0700
From: Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
To: Scott Feldman <scofeldm@...co.com>
CC: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] net: change bridge/macvlan hook to be be generic
On 05/04/2010 05:58 PM, Scott Feldman wrote:
> On 5/4/10 3:37 PM, "Stephen Hemminger"<shemminger@...tta.com> wrote:
>
>> The existing macvlan and bridge have special hooks in the packet input
>> path. This patch changes it to a generic hook chain, like the packet type
>> processing. I have been wanting to look into flow based switching, etc...
>
> Can this be further simplified by saying that a netdev can only be hooked by
> one mux (macvlan, bridge, etc) at any given time, so there is never more
> than one element in the hook chain. If so, then we just need a single hook,
> not a chain.
>
> It seems odd to me that a dev would have both macvlan_port != NULL and
> br_port != NULL. Can dev be in a macvlan and a bridge at the same time?
If we did add the generic hook list, then we could support other hooks, like
a pktgen rx hook to gather latency, pkt-loss, and similar stats, for example.
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists