[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BEC6B19.1040808@trash.net>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 23:11:53 +0200
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To: Chris Wright <chrisw@...hat.com>
CC: Scott Feldman <scofeldm@...co.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, arnd@...db.de
Subject: Re: [net-next-2.6 V6 PATCH 1/2] Add netlink support for virtual port
management (was iovnl)
Chris Wright wrote:
> * Patrick McHardy (kaber@...sh.net) wrote:
>> Chris Wright wrote:
>>> * Patrick McHardy (kaber@...sh.net) wrote:
>>>>> + } else {
>>>>> + err = rtnl_vf_port_fill_nest(skb, dev, -1);
>>>> What does -1 mean?
>>> It means no VFs. Could be made a macro/enum constant
>> Why call rtnl_vg_port_fill_nest at all in that case? It even
>> calls the ndo_get_vf_port() callback.
>
> For the case where port profile is set on net dev that does not
> have VFs (e.g. the enic case in 2/2).
Thanks for the explanation. I guess a enum constant would be nice
to have. But the bigger problem is the asymetrical message
parsing/construction.
BTW:
> +enum {
> + VF_PORT_REQUEST_PREASSOCIATE = 0,
> + VF_PORT_REQUEST_PREASSOCIATE_RR,
> + VF_PORT_REQUEST_ASSOCIATE,
> + VF_PORT_REQUEST_DISASSOCIATE,
> +};
Do multiple of these commands have to be issued in order to
reach "associated" state? That also wouldn't fit into the
rtnetlink design, which contains state, not commands.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists