[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTilvufsaxS6fMIvyobnTIPmWdMdNJxsxuoKdVA_X@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 11:37:40 -0700
From: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] drivers/net: Remove unnecessary returns from
void function()s
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 12:30 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h b/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
>> index 2aa3367..02497bc 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
>> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
>> @@ -368,15 +368,12 @@ void bond_unregister_ipv6_notifier(void);
>> #else
>> static inline void bond_send_unsolicited_na(struct bonding *bond)
>> {
>> - return;
>> }
>> static inline void bond_register_ipv6_notifier(void)
>> {
>> - return;
>> }
>> static inline void bond_unregister_ipv6_notifier(void)
>> {
>> - return;
>> }
>> #endif
>
> fyi: Patrick McHardy prefers null statement void functions to
> keep the return.
>
> There are some more removals of return like this in the patch.
> If a new patch should be generated, do tell.
>
If you're looking to save a few more lines, many places do the following:
static inline void bond_unregister_ipv6_notifier(void) {}
Cheers,
Harvey
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists