[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BED99A3.2050404@trash.net>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 20:42:43 +0200
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
CC: netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] netfilter: Remove skb_is_nonlinear check from nf_conntrack_sip
Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 08:13:03PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>> Your patch is based on an old version, the current version also
>> supports TCP. I'll commit this patch to my tree after some testing.
>
> Thanks!
>
>> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_sip.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_sip.c
>> index b20f427..45750cc 100644
>> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_sip.c
>> @@ -1393,10 +1393,8 @@ static int sip_help_tcp(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int protoff,
>>
>> nf_ct_refresh(ct, skb, sip_timeout * HZ);
>>
>> - if (skb_is_nonlinear(skb)) {
>> - pr_debug("Copy of skbuff not supported yet.\n");
>> + if (unlikely(skb_linearize(skb)))
>> return NF_ACCEPT;
>> - }
>
> Should this be NF_DROP? As I understand it skb_linearize only failes
> if it runs out of memory, which probably means dropping is OK. But
> passing a packet that might need rewriting could be harmful..
We so far also didn't rewrite the packet. But agreed, its
a corner case and dropping it is the safer choice.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists