[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BED9A85.4080507@trash.net>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 20:46:29 +0200
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To: Chris Wright <chrisw@...hat.com>
CC: Scott Feldman <scofeldm@...co.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next-2.6 V7 PATCH 1/2] Add netlink support for virtual port
management (was iovnl)
Chris Wright wrote:
> * Patrick McHardy (kaber@...sh.net) wrote:
>> Scott Feldman wrote:
>>> On 5/14/10 10:29 AM, "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> I think we should redo the other IFLA_VF_xxx msgs in the same style. I'm
>>>>> not going to tackle that for IFLA_VF_PORTS patch, but it would be a good
>>>>> followup patch.
>>>> I fear it's too late for that now. While we have not yet released 2.6.34
>>>> and 2.6.33 does not contain the broken message, it's extremely late in the
>>>> stabilization phase of v2.6.34, so I doubt that there is still a chance for
>>>> that at this point.
>>> That's too bad. I wish Patrick's objections were honored and then we
>>> wouldn't have followed that broken model! Can the broken msgs be disabled
>>> somehow for 2.6.34? Keep the definitions in if_link.h but fail the SET/GET
>>> actions in rtnetlink.c?
>> That would be a possibility. Unfortunately I don't think we can fix
>> this in a backwards compatible way.
>
> $ git describe --contains ebc08a6f47ee76ecad8e9f26c26e6ec9b46ca659
> v2.6.34-rc1~233^2~336
>
> It's not released yet?
Correct, it was added in 2.6.34-rc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists