netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/6] netns support in the kobject layer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100515.232643.212422307.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Sat, 15 May 2010 23:26:43 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	greg@...ah.com
Cc:	ebiederm@...ssion.com, gregkh@...e.de, kay.sievers@...y.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tj@...nel.org,
	cornelia.huck@...ibm.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com, bcrl@...et.ca,
	serue@...ibm.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] netns support in the kobject layer

From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 13:04:04 -0700

> On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 05:35:54PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> 
>> With the tagged sysfs support finally merged into Greg's tree,
>> it is time for the last little bits of work to get the kobject
>> layer and network namespaces to play together properly.
>> 
>> These patches are roughly evenly divided between network layer work
>> and sysfs layer work.  Last time this conundrum came up I believe
>> we decided that the easiest way to handle this was for Greg to carry
>> all of the patches.  David, Greg does that still make sense?
> 
> That's fine, if I get David's ack on these.

Looks good to me:

Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html