netdev - Re: [PATCH] rndis_host: Poll status channel before control channel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100515.225412.108764724.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Sat, 15 May 2010 22:54:12 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	ben@...adent.org.uk
Cc:	dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net, john.carr@...outed.co.uk,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, vzeeaxwl@...airpoint.net,
	herton@...driva.com.br
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rndis_host: Poll status channel before control channel

From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 14:37:15 +0100

> On Wed, 2010-05-12 at 23:42 -0700, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
>> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 00:08:28 +0100
>> 
>> > Some RNDIS devices don't respond on the control channel until polled
>> > on the status channel.  In particular, this was reported to be the
>> > case for the 2Wire HomePortal 1000SW.
>> > 
>> > This is roughly based on a patch by John Carr <john.carr@...outed.co.uk>
>> > which is reported to be needed for use with some Windows Mobile devices
>> > and which is currently applied by Mandriva.
>> > 
>> > Reported-by: Mark Glassberg <vzeeaxwl@...airpoint.net>
>> > Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
>> > Tested-by: Mark Glassberg <vzeeaxwl@...airpoint.net>
>> > ---
>> > Note that this change hasn't yet been tested with any other RNDIS
>> > devices.  John, can you confirm whether this also handles the WinMob
>> > devices?
>> 
>> Still waiting for this to get tested.  Is there really nobody in the
>> world with RNDIS devices who can test this patch?  If so, maybe that's
>> a good reason to not apply it :-))))
> 
> This has been in Debian unstable since 1 May and I haven't seen any
> fall-out yet.  However I acknowledge that absence of evidence is not
> evidence of absence.

I think I'll toss it into net-next-2.6 and we'll see if any monsters
come out of that.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html