netdev - Re: [PATCH] vhost: Storage class should be before const qualifier

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100517132748.GQ9489@distanz.ch>
Date:	Mon, 17 May 2010 15:27:48 +0200
From:	Tobias Klauser <tklauser@...tanz.ch>
To:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc:	kvm@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.osdl.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vhost: Storage class should be before const qualifier

On 2010-05-17 at 15:13:35 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 03:12:49PM +0200, Tobias Klauser wrote:
> > The C99 specification states in section 6.11.5:
> > 
> > The placement of a storage-class specifier other than at the beginning
> > of the declaration specifiers in a declaration is an obsolescent
> > feature.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <tklauser@...tanz.ch>
> 
> 
> Will apply, thanks!
> Just to clarify: does some compiler/checker actually barf on this?

GCC does emit a warning if the options '-std=c99 -W -Wall' are present.
ICC also does warn about this, though I don't know whether this depends
on any commandline options.

Cheers
Tobias
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html