netdev - Re: TCP-MD5 checksum failure on x86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100517134240.1949f245@nehalam>
Date:	Mon, 17 May 2010 13:42:40 -0700
From:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	Bijay Singh <Bijay.Singh@...vus.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"<bhaskie@...il.com>" <bhaskie@...il.com>,
	"<bhutchings@...arflare.com>" <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
Subject: Re: TCP-MD5 checksum failure on x86_64 SMP

On Mon, 17 May 2010 07:03:49 +0200
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:

> Le lundi 17 mai 2010 à 03:49 +0000, Bijay Singh a écrit :
> 
> > I am on quite an old kernel 2.6.27 and could not apply your patches.
> > 
> > Then i moved on to the kernel 2.6.32.11 however since then I have not been able to bring up my card, this is something i need to fix before i can test you fix. Working on that.
> > 
> 
> Thanks again for the status report.
> 
> I see bug is older than what I stated in my previous mail
> 
> I could reproduce it in my lab and confirm following patch fixes it
> 
> This is a stable candidate (2.6.27 kernels)
> 
> Thanks
> 
> [PATCH] tcp: tcp_synack_options() fix 
> 
> Commit 33ad798c924b4a (tcp: options clean up) introduced a problem
> if MD5+SACK+timestamps were used in initial SYN message.
> 
> Some stacks (old linux for example) try to negotiate MD5+SACK+TSTAMP
> sessions, but since 20 bytes of tcp options space are not enough to
> store all the bits needed, we chose to disable timestamps in this case.
> 
> We send a SYN-ACK _without_ timestamp option, but socket has timestamps
> enabled and all further outgoing messages contain a TS block, all with
> the initial timestamp of the remote peer.
> 
> Fix is to really disable timestamps option for the whole session.
> 
> Reported-by: Bijay Singh <Bijay.Singh@...vus.com>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> ---
>  net/ipv4/tcp_output.c |    5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
> index 0dda86e..b8bb226 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
> @@ -667,7 +667,7 @@ static unsigned tcp_synack_options(struct sock *sk,
>  	u8 cookie_plus = (xvp != NULL && !xvp->cookie_out_never) ?
>  			 xvp->cookie_plus :
>  			 0;
> -	bool doing_ts = ireq->tstamp_ok;
> +	bool doing_ts;
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_TCP_MD5SIG
>  	*md5 = tcp_rsk(req)->af_specific->md5_lookup(sk, req);
> @@ -680,11 +680,12 @@ static unsigned tcp_synack_options(struct sock *sk,
>  		 * rather than TS in order to fit in better with old,
>  		 * buggy kernels, but that was deemed to be unnecessary.
>  		 */
> -		doing_ts &= !ireq->sack_ok;
> +		ireq->tstamp_ok &= !ireq->sack_ok;
>  	}
>  #else
>  	*md5 = NULL;
>  #endif
> +	doing_ts = ireq->tstamp_ok;
>  
>  	/* We always send an MSS option. */
>  	opts->mss = mss;
> 
> 

Since you are doing away with flag variable, why not this instead?


--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c	2010-05-17 13:38:32.822025583 -0700
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c	2010-05-17 13:41:47.321734775 -0700
@@ -668,7 +668,6 @@ static unsigned tcp_synack_options(struc
 	u8 cookie_plus = (xvp != NULL && !xvp->cookie_out_never) ?
 			 xvp->cookie_plus :
 			 0;
-	bool doing_ts = ireq->tstamp_ok;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_TCP_MD5SIG
 	*md5 = tcp_rsk(req)->af_specific->md5_lookup(sk, req);
@@ -681,7 +680,7 @@ static unsigned tcp_synack_options(struc
 		 * rather than TS in order to fit in better with old,
 		 * buggy kernels, but that was deemed to be unnecessary.
 		 */
-		doing_ts &= !ireq->sack_ok;
+		ireq->tstamp_ok &= !ireq->sack_ok;
 	}
 #else
 	*md5 = NULL;
@@ -696,7 +695,7 @@ static unsigned tcp_synack_options(struc
 		opts->options |= OPTION_WSCALE;
 		remaining -= TCPOLEN_WSCALE_ALIGNED;
 	}
-	if (likely(doing_ts)) {
+	if (likely(ireq->tstamp_ok)) {
 		opts->options |= OPTION_TS;
 		opts->tsval = TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->when;
 		opts->tsecr = req->ts_recent;
@@ -704,7 +703,7 @@ static unsigned tcp_synack_options(struc
 	}
 	if (likely(ireq->sack_ok)) {
 		opts->options |= OPTION_SACK_ADVERTISE;
-		if (unlikely(!doing_ts))
+		if (unlikely(!ireq->tstamp_ok))
 			remaining -= TCPOLEN_SACKPERM_ALIGNED;
 	}
 
@@ -712,7 +711,7 @@ static unsigned tcp_synack_options(struc
 	 * If the <SYN> options fit, the same options should fit now!
 	 */
 	if (*md5 == NULL &&
-	    doing_ts &&
+	    ireq->tstamp_ok &&
 	    cookie_plus > TCPOLEN_COOKIE_BASE) {
 		int need = cookie_plus; /* has TCPOLEN_COOKIE_BASE */
 


 



-- 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html