netdev - Re: bnx2/BCM5709: why 5 interrupts on a 4 core system (2.6.33.3)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4BF2AA55.5050100@ans.pl>
Date:	Tue, 18 May 2010 16:55:17 +0200
From:	Krzysztof Olędzki <ole@....pl>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC:	Michael Chan <mchan@...adcom.com>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: bnx2/BCM5709: why 5 interrupts on a 4 core system (2.6.33.3)

On 2010-05-18 16:26, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le mardi 18 mai 2010 à 16:22 +0200, Krzysztof Olędzki a écrit :
>
>> Thank you. What happens if I set it to a lower/bigger value, than
>> avaliable txqueues in a NIC?
>
> lower values ->  same situation than today (not all txqueues will be
> used)
>
> bigger values ->  it will be capped, so its only a bit more ram
> allocated.

So it is safe to put there little bigger value than needed. Thanks.

Best regards,

			Krzysztof Olędzki
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html