[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BF2BF0A.8000405@freescale.com>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 11:23:38 -0500
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>
To: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] ptp: Added a clock that uses the eTSEC found on
the MPC85xx.
On 05/18/2010 01:36 AM, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 01:05:54PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
>>>>>> + - tmr_fiper1 Fixed interval period pulse generator.
>>>>>> + - tmr_fiper2 Fixed interval period pulse generator.
>>>>
>>
>> MPC8572 and P2020 have fiper3 as well.
>
> I doubt they really have a third fiper.
>
> First of all, this signal is not routed anywhere on the boards.
OK, but that's a separate issue from whether it exists on the chip and
could be used on a different board.
> Also, according to the documentation, it has no bit in the TMR_CTRL or the
> TMR_TEMASK registers.
It does seem inconsistent -- but could just be bad docs.
> Unless there is a bit in TMR_TEMASK, you cannot
> get an interrupt from it.
>
> If you cannot use the signal externally (in the "real" world) and you
> cannot get an interrupt, what good is it to have such a periodic
> signal? Polling the bit in the TMR_TEVENT to see when a pulse occurs
> seems pointless.
>
> Scott, you have connections, right? Can you clarify this for me?
I'll ask around.
-Scott
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists