[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100520004330.GF5146@nuttenaction>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 02:43:30 +0200
From: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@...u.net>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Cc: Stefano Salsano <stefano.salsano@...roma2.it>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Fabio Ludovici <fabio.ludovici@...oo.it>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, netem@...ts.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] netem: correlated loss generation (v3)
* Stephen Hemminger | 2010-05-19 17:17:33 [-0700]:
>The old model was useful, but it really didn't do correlated loss.
>For legacy, the old syntax will go through the same code and generate
>the same result.
Is this really necessary? The right thing is to fix the broken behavior! If
the new patch provides this, great. Imaging a network analysis for a PhD
dissertation based on a broken correlation algorithm - the whole results are
misleading and wrong. No one deserves this ... ;-)
If the current algorithm is broken then the mechanism must be fixed. Preserve
compatibility is counterproductive in this case.
>tc qdisc change dev eth0 root netem
> loss 2 10 # compat syntax
> loss random 2 10 # same as above
> loss deterministic file # loss model based on bitmap
> loss state p13 [p31 [p32 [p23 [p14]]]] # 4 state
> loss model p [r [1-h [1-k]]] # gilbert elliot model
>
>Any suggestions for better syntax are appreciated.
Not at the moment, looks clear and understandable.
Cheers, Hagen
--
Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@...u.net> || http://jauu.net/
Telephone: +49 174 5455209 || Key Id: 0x98350C22
Key Fingerprint: 490F 557B 6C48 6D7E 5706 2EA2 4A22 8D45 9835 0C22
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists